Kings in Exile — Text and Context
Edition facts
The catalog record for Kings in Exile — Text and Context provides practical reading context through 63,520 words, 4 hr 37 min estimated reading time, and 8 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 21.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Animals -- Anecdotes,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
at was what two grim old sachems of the Dacotahs had dubbed him; and though his official title, on the lists of the Zoölogical Park, was "Kaiser," the new and more significant name had promptly supplanted it. The Park authorities--people of imagination and of sentiment, as must all be who would deal successfully with wild animals--had felt at once that the name aptly embodied the tragedies and the romantic memories of his all-but-vanished race. They had felt, too, that the two old braves who had been brought East to adorn a city pageant, and who had stood gazing stoically for hours at the great bull buffalo through the barrier of the steel-wire fence, were fitted, before all others, to give him a name. Between him and them there was surely a tragic bond, as they stood there islanded among the swelling tides of civilization which had already engulfed their kindreds. "Last Bull" they had called him, as he answered their gaze with little, sullen, melancholy eyes from under his ponderous and shaggy front. "Last Bull"--and the passing of his race was in the name.
Here, in his fenced, protected range, with a space of grassy meadow, half a dozen clumps of sheltering trees, two hundred yards of the run of a clear, unfailing brook, and a warm shed for refuge against the winter storms, the giant buffalo ruled his little herd of three tawny cows, two yearlings, and one blundering, butting calf of the season. He was a magnificent specimen of his race--surpassing, it was said, the finest bull in the Yellowstone preserves or in the guarded Canadian herd of the North. Little short of twelve feet in length, a good five foot ten in height at the tip of his humped and huge fore-shoulders, he seemed to justify the most extravagant tales of pioneer and huntsman. His hind-quarters were trim and fine-lined, built apparently for speed, smooth-haired, and of a grayish lion-color. But his fore-shoulders, mounting to an enormous hump, were of an elephantine massiveness, and clothed in a dense, curling, golden-brown growth of matted hair. His mighty head was carried low, almost to the level of his knees, on a neck of colossal strength, which was draped, together with the forelegs down to the knees, in a flowing brown mane tipped with black. His head, too, to the very muzzle, wore the same luxuriant and sombre drapery, out of which curved viciously the keen-tipped crescent of his horns. Dark, huge, and ominous, he looked curiously out of place in the secure and familiar tranquillity of his green pasture.
For a distance of perhaps fifty yards, at the back of the pasture, the range of the buffalo herd adjoined that of the moose, divided from it by that same fence of heavy steel-wire mesh, supported by iron posts, which surrounded the whole range. One sunny and tingling day in late October--such a day as makes the blood race full red through all healthy veins--a magnificent stranger was brought to the Park, and turned into the moose-range.
The newcomer was a New Brunswick bull moose, captured on the Tobique during the previous spring when the snow was deep and soft, and purchased for the Park by one of the big Eastern lumber-merchants. The moose-herd had consisted, hitherto, of four lonely cows, and the splendid bull was a prize which the Park had long been coveting. He took lordly possession, forthwith, of the submissive little herd, and led them off at once from the curious crowds about the gate to explore the wild-looking thickets at the back of the pasture. But no sooner had he fairly entered these thickets than he found his further progress barred by the steel-meshed fence. This was a bitter disappointment, for he had expected to go striding through miles of alder swamp and dark spruce woods, fleeing the hated world of men and bondage, before setting himself to get acquainted with his new followers. His high-strung temper was badly jarred. He drew off, shaking his vast antlers, and went shambling with spacious stride down along the barrier towards the brook. The four cows, in single file, hurried after him anxiously, afraid he might be snatched away from them.
Last Bull, standing solitary and morose on a little knoll in his pasture, caught sight of the strange, dark figure of the running moose. A spark leapt into his heavy eyes. He wheeled, pawed the sod, put his muzzle to the ground, and bellowed a sonorous challenge. The moose stopped short and stared about him, the stiff hair lifting angrily along the ridge of his massive neck. Last Bull lowered his head and tore up the sod with his horns.
In Kings in Exile, Charles G. D. Roberts presents a series of narratives centered on wild animals held in captivity or struggling against human encroachment. The title itself signals the author’s framing: these creatures are not mere specimens but displaced rulers, their dignity intact despite confinement. The opening story, “Last Bull,” introduces a buffalo named by two Dakota elders who recognize a fellow survivor of a vanishing world. Roberts’s prose is attentive to physical detail—the bull’s “solitary and morose” stance, the precise description of a puma’s crouch—and to the animals’ interior lives, inferred from behavior rather than anthropomorphism. The collection balances natural history with a somber awareness of loss.
Captivity and Dignity
Roberts repeatedly emphasizes the composure of captive animals. The buffalo “Last Bull” stands “solitary and morose on a little knoll in his pasture,” a posture that suggests both isolation and quiet authority. In “The Sun-Gazer,” a young eagle, after being tethered, “settled himself like a rock and stared unwinkingly at his captor.” This refusal to struggle futilely becomes a mark of pride. The author avoids sentimentalizing; instead, he notes the animal’s practical assessment of its situation. The puma in “The King of the Flaming Hoops” is described with “wicked little dark eyes” that “glowed suddenly red,” a detail that conveys menace without moral judgment. Roberts’s animals are not victims but protagonists whose responses to constraint reveal their essential nature.
Precise Observation of Movement
The narratives are built on close attention to physical action. In “Last Bull,” the buffalo’s charge is rendered with kinetic specificity: “For perhaps thirty or forty yards the bull was able to keep up this almost incredible pace.” The eagle’s attack in “The Sun-Gazer” is described as “dropping like a thunderbolt out of the blue,” followed by a “great buffet of air on his face” as it swerves. Roberts tracks the mechanics of a puma’s spring, a bear’s climb, and the writhing of octopus tentacles in “The Lord of the Glass House.” These passages ground the stories in tangible reality, making the animals’ capabilities vivid without exaggeration. The author’s background in natural history informs this precision, but the writing never becomes clinical; it retains a sense of drama.
The Human Witness
Human characters appear as observers, captors, or accidental intruders. In “The Sun-Gazer,” the man Horner captures a young eagle, but his victory is precarious: he glances up to see the mother “dropping like a thunderbolt” and barely escapes. The human is often outmatched or humbled. The zoo authorities in “Last Bull” are credited with “imagination and of sentiment,” yet they cannot restore the buffalo’s lost world. The two Dakota elders who name the bull stand “islanded among the swelling tides of civilization,” a phrase that links their own displacement to the animal’s. Roberts uses these human figures to reflect on the cost of progress, but he keeps the focus on the animals, whose reactions—defiance, wariness, acceptance—drive the narrative.
Readers should approach Kings in Exile as a set of linked character studies rather than a continuous plot. Each story stands alone, but together they build a meditation on freedom and constraint. Pay attention to how Roberts uses small physical details—a glance, a posture, a hesitation—to convey the animal’s state of mind. The collection rewards those who read slowly, letting the precise descriptions accumulate into a portrait of resilience.
Reading about those exiled monarchs, I remembered my old dog pacing the fence line for days after we moved. He knew every inch of our previous yard by heart, and I could feel his bewilderment mirroring the buffalo's. A Hermit's Wild Friends; or, Eighteen Years in the Woods — Reading Companion once gave me that same ache for a freedom I hadn't lost yet.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How will you remember this book?
Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.