The House Fly and How to Suppress It — Story, Setting & Ideas
Edition facts
The source record for The House Fly and How to Suppress It — Story, Setting & Ideas measures this digital text at 10,517 words, 46 min estimated reading time, and 2 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 20.5 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Pests -- Control,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Produced by K.D. Thornton and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
FARMERS' BULLETIN No. 1408
_The_ HOUSE FLY AND HOW TO SUPPRESS IT
The presence of flies is an indication of uncleanliness, insanitary conditions, and improper disposal of substances in which they breed. They are not only annoying; they are actually dangerous to health, because they may carry disease germs to exposed foods.
It is therefore important to know where and how they breed, and to apply such knowledge in combating them. This bulletin gives information on this subject. Besides giving directions for ridding the house of flies by the use of screens, fly papers, poisons, and flytraps, it lays especial emphasis on the explanation of methods of eliminating breeding places and preventing the breeding of flies.
This bulletin supersedes Farmers' Bulletin 851.
Washington, D. C. Issued April, 1925; revised November, 1926
THE HOUSE FLY[1] AND HOW TO SUPPRESS IT.
By L. O. HOWARD, _Chief of the Bureau of Entomology_, and F. C. BISHOPP, _Entomologist_.
CONTENTS. Page. Kinds of flies found in houses 1 Where the true house fly lays its eggs 2 How the house fly passes the winter 6 Carriage of disease by the house fly 6 Excluding and capturing flies 7 The use of screens 7 Fly papers and poisons 8 Fly sprays 8 Flytraps 9 Preventing the breeding of flies 9 Construction and care of stables 9 Fly-tight manure pits 10 Frequency with which manure should be removed in cities and towns 10 Health office regulations for control of house flies in cities 10 Disposal of manure in rural and suburban districts 11 Chemical treatment of manure to destroy fly maggots 12 Maggot trap for destruction of fly larvæ from horse manure 13 Compact heaping of manure 15 Garbage disposal and treatment of miscellaneous breeding places 15 Sewage disposal in relation to the prevention of fly-borne diseases 15 What communities can do to eliminate the house fly 16
KINDS OF FLIES FOUND IN HOUSES.
Several species of flies are found commonly in houses. Some of them so closely resemble the true house fly that it requires very careful observation to distinguish them from it.
One of these is the biting stable fly[2] (fig. 1). It occurs frequently in houses and differs from the house fly in the important particular that its mouth parts are formed for piercing the skin. This fly is so often mistaken for the house fly that most people think that the house fly can bite.
Another frequent visitant of houses, particularly in the spring and fall, is the cluster fly.[3] It is somewhat larger than the house fly, and is distinguished by its covering of fine yellowish hairs. Occasionally this fly occurs in houses in such numbers as to cause great annoyance. It gets its name of "cluster fly" from its habit of collecting in compact groups or clusters in protected corners during cold periods.
Several species of metallic greenish or bluish flies also are found occasionally in houses. These include a blue-bottle fly,[4] the black blowflies,[5] and the green-bottle (fig. 2) flies.[6] They breed in decaying animal matter.
[Footnote 1: _Musca domestica_ L.] [Footnote 2: _Stomoxys calcitrans_ L.] [Footnote 3: _Pollenia rudis_ Fab.] [Footnote 4: _Calliphora erythrocephala_ Meig.] [Footnote 5: _Phormia regina_ Meig. and _P. terrae-novae_ Desv.] [Footnote 6: _Lucilia caesar_ L., _L. sericata_ Meig., and other species of the genus.]
There is still another species, smaller than any of those so far mentioned, which is sometimes called the "lesser house fly."[7] This insect is distinguished from the ordinary house fly by its paler and more pointed body. The male, which is commoner than the female, has large pale patches at the base of the abdomen, which are translucent when the fly is seen on the window pane. These little flies are not the young of the larger flies. Flies do not grow after the wings have once expanded and dried.
[Footnote 7: _Fannia canicularis_ L.]
In late summer and autumn many specimens of a small fruit fly, known as the "vinegar fly,"[8] make their appearance, attracted by the odor of overripe fruit.
All of these species, however, are greatly dwarfed in numbers by the common house fly. In 1900 the senior author made collections of the flies in dining rooms in different parts of the country, and found that the true house fly made up 98.8 per cent of the whole number captured. The remainder comprised various species, including those mentioned above.
[Footnote 8: _Drosophila ampelophila_ Loew.]
WHERE THE TRUE HOUSE FLY LAYS ITS EGGS.
The true house fly (fig. 3), which is found in nearly all parts of the world, is a medium-sized fly with four black stripes on the back and a sharp elbow in one of the veins of the wings. The house fly can not bite, its mouth parts being spread out at the tip for sucking up liquid substances.
The bulletin opens with a blunt assertion: 'The presence of flies is an indication of uncleanliness, insanitary conditions, and improper disposal of substances in which they breed.' This sentence establishes a tone of direct, public-health authority. The authors, both entomologists, immediately link fly presence to human negligence, framing the work as a corrective guide. The language is clinical and imperative, avoiding moralizing in favor of observable cause and effect.
The structure mirrors a scientific report: a contents page lists sections from 'Kinds of flies found in houses' to 'What communities can do.' Each section builds on the last, moving from identification to control. The voice is consistently impersonal, using passive constructions ('It is therefore important to know') and precise measurements ('½ pound of the powder to every 10 gallons of water'). This diction reflects the bulletin's origin in the U.S. Department of Agriculture, where credibility rests on replicable data.
Distinguishing Flies Through Descriptive Precision
The authors devote the first section to differentiating house flies from look-alikes, using careful physical detail. The biting stable fly is noted for 'mouth parts formed for piercing the skin'—a phrase that clarifies why some people believe house flies bite. The cluster fly is 'somewhat larger' and distinguished by 'its covering of fine yellowish hairs.' These descriptions are not merely taxonomic; they serve a practical purpose: misidentification leads to ineffective control.
The language avoids technical jargon where possible, opting for accessible terms like 'blue-bottle fly' and 'green-bottle.' Yet the authors maintain scientific rigor by including Latin names in footnotes. This balance between lay readability and entomological accuracy characterizes the bulletin's voice. The emphasis on visual cues—size, color, hair—trains the reader to observe carefully, a skill essential for suppression.
Chemical Treatments: Hellebore and Borax
The bulletin's core recommendations involve two chemicals: hellebore and borax. The authors present each with experimental evidence. For hellebore, they specify a 'water extract' prepared by adding '½ pound of the powder to every 10 gallons of water,' then standing for 24 hours. Results from 12 experiments show 'destruction of from 88 to 99 per cent of the fly larvæ.' The language is cautious: 'It appears that such treatment results in…'
Borax is described as 'even more effective,' with a minimum dose of '0.62 pound per 8 bushels of manure.' The authors note its advantages: 'comparatively nonpoisonous and noninflammable.' However, they also warn of potential crop injury if overapplied, repeating a 'warning issued in connection with a previous bulletin.' This cross-referencing and repeated caution reflect the authors' awareness of their audience—farmers and householders who might misuse chemicals.
The Role of Manure Management in Fly Suppression
Manure is identified as the primary breeding site, and the bulletin devotes extensive space to its management. The authors recommend 'fly-tight manure pits' and specify removal frequency in cities and towns. They describe a 'maggot trap for destruction of fly larvæ from horse manure' and advocate 'compact heaping of manure' to reduce breeding. The diction is instructional: 'How can fly breeding be prevented in such accumulations?' followed by two practical methods.
The language shifts from descriptive to prescriptive. Sentences become shorter, more direct: 'The first is the treatment of the manure pile with chemical substances.' The authors assume the reader has access to manure and the ability to implement these methods. They also address 'garbage disposal and treatment of miscellaneous breeding places,' broadening the scope beyond stables. This section exemplifies the bulletin's pragmatic ethos: every recommendation is tied to a specific action.
Community Action and the Limits of Individual Effort
The final section, 'What communities can do to eliminate the house fly,' expands the focus from individual to collective action. The authors argue that fly suppression requires coordinated efforts, including 'health office regulations for control of house flies in cities.' They reference 'sewage disposal in relation to the prevention of fly-borne diseases,' linking sanitation infrastructure to public health.
The voice here becomes more urgent, though still measured. The authors avoid hyperbole, instead citing the need for 'proper disposal of substances in which they breed.' The bulletin ends not with a summary but with a call to apply the knowledge systematically. This structural choice—moving from identification to individual treatment to community regulation—mirrors the logical progression of a public health campaign. The authors trust the reader to follow this chain of reasoning.
This bulletin is best read as a period document of applied entomology, where authority derives from government research and the reader is assumed to be a practical farmer or householder. The authors' choices in diction—precise, cautious, imperative—reveal a genre that balances scientific rigor with actionable advice. For modern readers, the work offers insight into early 20th-century public health messaging and the material conditions of fly control before widespread insecticides.
That rainy afternoon, the bulletin’s brisk, no-nonsense remedies for flies felt oddly soothing, its world of tidy suppressions and practical certainties. Afterwards, I idly picked up Our Humble Helpers: Familiar Talks on the Domestic Animals — Reading Companion and found myself slowing down, lingering over creature comforts rather than campaigns, a gentler counterweight to all that brisk extermination. Our Humble Helpers: Familiar Talks on the Domestic Animals — Reading Companion sat beside it on the sill, both quiet under the same grey light.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
How did this book work for you?
Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.