The Extermination of the American Bison — Text and Context
Edition facts
For The Extermination of the American Bison — Text and Context, the stored edition analysis reports 97,298 words, 7 hr 4 min estimated reading time, and 13 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 24.1 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “American bison,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Thus was the first seen buffalo described. The nearest locality from whence it could have come was the State of Coahuila, in northern Mexico, between 400 and 500 miles away, and at that time vehicles were unknown to the Aztecs. But for the destruction of the whole mass of the written literature of the Aztecs by the priests of the Spanish Conquest, we might now be reveling in historical accounts of the bison which would make the oldest of our present records seem of comparatively recent date.
Nine years after the event referred to above, or in 1530, another Spanish explorer, Alvar Nuñez Cabeza, afterwards called Cabeza de Vaca--or, in other words "Cattle Cabeza," the prototype of our own distinguished "Buffalo Bill"--was wrecked on the Gulf coast, west of the delta of the Mississippi, from whence he wandered westward through what is now the State of Texas. In southeastern Texas he discovered the American bison on his native heath. So far as can be ascertained, this was the earliest discovery of the bison in a wild state, and the description of the species as recorded by the explorer is of historical interest. It is brief and superficial. The unfortunate explorer took very little interest in animated nature, except as it contributed to the sum of his daily food, which was then the all-important subject of his thoughts. He almost starved. This is all he has to say:[1]
[Note 1: Davis' Spanish Conquest of New Mexico. 1869. P. 67.]
"Cattle come as far as this. I have seen them three times, and eaten of their meat. I think they are about the size of those in Spain. They have small horns like those of Morocco, and the hair long and flocky, like that of the merino. Some are light brown (_pardillas_) and others black. To my judgment the flesh is finer and sweeter than that of this country [Spain]. The Indians make blankets of those that are not full grown, and of the larger they make shoes and bucklers. They come as far as the sea-coast of Florida [now Texas], and in a direction from the north, and range over a district of more than 400 leagues. In the whole extent of plain over which they roam, the people who live bordering upon it descend and kill them for food, and thus a great many skins are scattered throughout the country."
Coronado was the next explorer who penetrated the country of the buffalo, which he accomplished from the west, by way of Arizona and New Mexico. He crossed the southern part of the "Pan-handle" of Texas, to the edge of what is now the Indian Territory, and returned through the same region. It was in the year 1542 that he reached the buffalo country, and traversed the plains that were "full of crooke-backed oxen, as the mountaine Serena in Spaine is of sheepe." This is the description of the animal as recorded by one of his followers, Castañeda, and translated by W. W. Davis:[2]
[Note 2: The Spanish Conquest of New Mexico. Davis. 1869. Pp. 206-7.]
"The first time we encountered the buffalo, all the horses took to flight on seeing them, for they are horrible to the sight.
"They have a broad and short face, eyes two palms from each other, and projecting in such a manner sideways that they can see a pursuer. Their beard is like that of goats, and so long that it drags the ground when they lower the head. They have, on the anterior portion of the body, a frizzled hair like sheep's wool; it is very fine upon the croup, and sleek like a lion's mane. Their horns are very short and thick, and can scarcely be seen through the hair. They always change their hair in May, and at this season they really resemble lions. To make it drop more quickly, for they change it as adders do their skins, they roll among the brush-wood which they find in the ravines.
"Their tail is very short, and terminates in a great tuft. When they run they carry it in the air like scorpions. When quite young they are tawny, and resemble our calves; but as age increases they change color and form.
"Another thing which struck us was that all the old buffaloes that we killed had the left ear cloven, while it was entire in the young; we could never discover the reason of this.
"Their wool is so fine that handsome clothes would certainly be made of it, but it can not be dyed for it is tawny red. We were much surprised at sometimes meeting innumerable herds of bulls without a single cow, and other herds of cows without bulls."
William T. Hornaday’s 1889 report, originally published as a Smithsonian Institution bulletin, moves between two distinct modes: a naturalist’s taxonomy of the American bison and a hunter’s chronicle of its destruction. The work opens with a detailed life history—covering the bison’s rank among ruminants, seasonal pelage changes, and the physical development from calf to adult bull—then shifts to a methodical account of the slaughter. The language in the first half is clinical, even admiring; the second half adopts the terse, inventory-like prose of a still-hunter’s logbook.
A Naturalist’s Taxonomy of the Bison
Hornaday devotes the first part of the report to a systematic description of the bison’s anatomy, growth stages, and behavior. He distinguishes the “spike bull” from the adult bull, notes the cow’s third-year form, and even describes the shedding of the winter pelage as a seasonal event. The prose here is precise and detached: the bison is measured, weighed, and classified. Hornaday also includes a section on the “Wood” or “Mountain Buffalo,” treating it as a variant rather than a separate species. This taxonomic approach gives the reader a baseline—a portrait of the animal as a biological subject before it becomes a commodity.
The Still-Hunter’s Inventory
In Part II, the narrative voice shifts abruptly. Hornaday recounts the methods of slaughter—the “still hunt,” the chase on horseback, impounding, and decoying—but the most striking passage is a detailed inventory of a hunter’s outfit. James McNaney’s 1882-83 season is itemized: two wagons, four-horse teams, three Sharps rifles of different calibers, 550 pounds of lead, 4,500 primers, and sixty Wilson skinning knives. The list continues with flour, bacon, and canned vegetables. This catalog of equipment, rendered in the same flat tone as the bison’s anatomical description, makes the slaughter feel like an industrial process. The hunter’s daily load—a 16- to 19-pound rifle, seventy-five to one hundred cartridges, and a “hunter’s companion” of knives—is presented without commentary, leaving the weight of the prose to imply the weight of the work.
Pace and the Mechanics of Killing
Hornaday’s account of the still-hunt is notable for its attention to pace and precaution. The hunter, he writes, “exercised the greatest precaution in killing his game” to avoid frightening away survivors. Finding a “bunch” of fifty head in a secluded draw was considered “the height of good luck” because it allowed a kill without disturbing the larger herd. The narrative slows to describe the hunter’s approach on foot, the careful selection of a range, and the camp’s placement “screened from distant observation by a circle of hills and ridges.” This deliberate pacing mirrors the hunter’s own method: a slow, patient stalking that contrasts with the rapid, systematic slaughter that followed. Hornaday’s prose, by lingering on these details, makes the reader feel the tension between the hunter’s craft and the extermination it served.
Hornaday’s report is best read as two documents in one: a natural history that treats the bison as a living species, and a field report that treats it as a resource to be extracted. The shift in voice between these sections is the work’s most revealing feature. Readers may find it useful to compare the language used to describe the bison’s biology with the language used to describe the hunter’s equipment—the same flat, enumerative style serves both purposes, and the contrast is telling.
Hornaday’s account of the bison left that hollow ache you get when something immense slips away. I kept thinking about how he documented disappearance so carefully, almost lovingly. There’s a gentle, scattered feeling in Jacky Dandy's Delight — Reading Notes that reminded me of that same quiet attention—not to loss, but to what lingers in the margins. It stayed with me unexpectedly.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
Your personal reading reflection
Build a private reading journal entry for this title.