Ants and Some Other Insects: An Inquiry Into the Psychic Powers of These Animals — A Reader’s Guide

(0 User reviews)   72
In Category - Animals
Forel, Auguste, 1848-1931, Wheeler, William Morton, 1865-1937 [Translator] Project Gutenberg 2016 Not confirmed
Psychology, Comparative; Insects -- Biology Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 23,585
Reading time 103 min
Text sections 3

Ants and Some Other Insects: An Inquiry Into the Psychic Powers of These Animals — A Reader’s Guide can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 23,585 words, 1 hr 43 min estimated reading time, and 3 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 19.7 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Psychology, Comparative,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Forel's 1904 study examines ant psychology through detailed observations of instinct, will, and emotion, arguing against mechanistic views by presenting evidence of individual decision-making and social behavior in ants.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.6/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

first he concealed his Dahlias incompletely (i. e., only their ray-florets), afterwards completely, but still in an unsatisfactory manner, and inferred from the results that bees are attracted by odor and not by sight.

_a._ In a Dahlia bed visited by many bees and comprising about forty-three floral heads of different colors, I covered first seventeen and then eight at 2.15 P. M., September 10th, with grape-leaves bent around them and fastened with pins.

_b._ Of four I covered only the yellow disc;

_c._ Of one, on the other hand, I covered only the outer ray-florets, leaving the disc visible.

So many bees were visiting the Dahlias that at times there were two or three to a flower.

Result: Immediately all the completely covered flowers ceased to be visited by the bees. Dahlia (_c_) continued to be visited like those completely visible. The bees often flew to Dahlias (_b_) but at once abandoned them; a few, however, succeeded in finding the disc beneath the leaves.

Then as soon as I removed the covering from a red Dahlia the bees at once flew to it; and soon a poorly concealed specimen was detected and visited. Later an inquisitive bee discovered the entrance to a covered Dahlia from the side or from below. Thenceforth this bee, but only this one, returned to this same covered flower.

Nevertheless several bees seemed to be seeking the Dahlias which had so suddenly disappeared. Towards 5.30 o’clock some of them had detected the covered flowers. Thenceforth these insects were rapidly imitated by the other bees, and in a short time the hidden flowers were again being visited. As soon as a bee had discovered my imposition and found the entrance to a hidden flower, she flew in her subsequent journeys, without hesitation to the concealed opening of the grape-leaf. As long as a bee had merely made the discovery by herself, she remained unnoticed by the others. When this was accomplished by several, however, (usually by four or five,) the others followed their example.

Plateau, therefore, conducted his experiments in a faulty manner and obtained erroneous results. The bees still saw the Dahlias which he at first incompletely concealed. Then, by the time he had covered them up completely, but only from above, they had already detected the fraud and saw the Dahlias also from the side. Plateau had failed to take into consideration the bee’s memory and attention.

September 13th I made some crude imitations of Dahlias by sticking the yellow heads of Hieracium (hawkweed) each in a Petunia flower, and placed them among the Dahlias. Neither the Petunias nor the Hieracium had been visited by the bees. Nevertheless many of the honey and humble-bees flew at first to the artefacts in almost as great numbers as to the Dahlias, but at once abandoned the flowers when they had detected the error, obviously by means of their sense of smell. The same results were produced by a Dahlia, the disc of which had been replaced by the disc of a Hieracium.

As a control experiment I had placed a beautiful, odorous Dahlia disc among the white and yellow Chrysanthemums which had been neglected by the bees. For a whole half hour the bees flew by only a few centimeters above the disc without noticing it; not till then was it visited by a bee that happened to be followed by a second. From this moment the Dahlia disc which lay in the path of flight was visited like the others, whereas on the other hand the Petunia-Hieracium artefacts, now known to be fraudulent, were no longer noticed.

Plateau has demonstrated that artificial flowers, no matter how carefully copied from the human standpoint, are not noticed by insects. I placed artefacts of this description among the Dahlias. They remained in fact entirely neglected. Perhaps, as above suggested, the bees are able to distinguish the chlorophyll colors from other artificial hues, owing to admixtures of the ultra-violet rays, or by some other means. But since Plateau imagines that the artificial flowers repel insects, I cut out, Sept. 19th, the following rather crude paper-flowers:

δ A blue flower, with a yellow center made from a dead leaf;

ε. A rose-colored piece of paper with a dry Dahlia disc;

ζ. A green Dahlia leaf (unchanged).

It was nine o’clock in the morning. I placed a drop of honey on each of the six artefacts mounted among the Dahlias. For a quarter of an hour many bees flew past, very close to my artefacts but without perceiving and hence without smelling the honey. I went away for an hour. On my return artefact δ was without honey, and must therefore have been discovered by the bees. All the others had remained quite untouched and unnoticed.

Forel opens his inquiry by positioning ants as creatures that, despite vast differences in organization from humans, have developed social commonwealths through convergence. He immediately engages with contemporary debates, referencing Bethe and Uexküll, who deny psychic powers in invertebrates, and aligning with Wasmann and Lubbock in advocating for comparative psychology. The work is structured as a response to these mechanistic interpretations, using detailed observations to argue for the existence of will, emotion, and individual decision-making in ants.

The Structure of the Argument

Forel builds his case by moving from general principles to specific examples. He first establishes the need for a foundation in comparative psychology and sense-organ function, referencing his own earlier work. Then he systematically addresses the reflex-machine hypothesis, countering it with observations of ant behavior that suggest flexibility and learning. The argument proceeds through distinct realms: instinct, will, and feeling, each treated as a separate domain of psychic life. This tripartite structure allows Forel to isolate and examine different aspects of ant psychology, from automatic behaviors to emotional contagion.

Recurring Images of Struggle and Defeat

A striking pattern in the excerpts is the use of combat and defeat as windows into ant psychology. Forel describes battles between colonies where "the tenacity of the struggle and with it the will to conquer increases" until one party is overpowered. He also notes the phenomenon of "abulic dejection" after repeated failure, where ants flee from a single enemy they would have killed moments before. These images serve a dual purpose: they illustrate the presence of will and emotion, and they provide a concrete, observable basis for inferring psychic states. The victor's ability to "notice and utilise" the opponent's discouragement is presented as evidence of social cognition.

Movement Between Instinct and Individual Action

Forel carefully navigates the boundary between instinct and individual decision. He acknowledges that ant actions occur "within the confines of the instinct-precincts of the species" and that stages of a project are instinctive. Yet he insists that ants "associate and consider somewhat in a concrete way after the manner of an ant" when pursuing a goal. The text moves back and forth between describing fixed patterns and highlighting moments of plasticity, such as when an ant pursues a specific aim and "combines its instincts with this special object in view." This oscillation mirrors the tension between mechanistic and psychological explanations that drives the entire inquiry.

The Realm of Feeling as a Structural Pivot

Forel devotes a distinct section to feeling, which he introduces with a hint of self-awareness: "It may perhaps sound ludicrous to speak of feelings in insects." He then justifies the inquiry by noting how deeply instinctive human emotions are and how closely they are interwoven with impulses. This section functions as a pivot, extending the argument from will to a more subjective domain. Forel claims that emotions in ants are "so clearly" recognizable that even Uexküll would have to capitulate. The structure here mirrors the earlier pattern: a general claim, a defense against skepticism, and an implicit challenge to the reader to observe the evidence.

Readers approaching this work should attend to how Forel weaves together observational anecdotes and theoretical rebuttals. The excerpts reveal a text that is as much a polemic against mechanistic biology as it is a study of ants. Pay particular attention to the way Forel uses specific incidents—a battle, a failed return to the nest—to ground his claims about will and emotion. The structure, moving from instinct through will to feeling, is itself an argument for the layered complexity of ant psychic life.

There’s a quiet awe in watching an ant make a choice, as Forel did, and it lingers long after the book is shut. It reminds me of the patient wonder I felt in The Wonders of the Jungle, Book Two — Story, Setting & Ideas, where every small creature seems to carry its own secret purpose. I still think about that sometimes.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

What did you think of this book?

Answer a few questions and save a private reflection on this device.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Have you finished this book?

2

What was your overall reaction to the book?

3

Is this a title you would suggest to others?

4

Did the language feel accessible?

Related eBooks