My pets — Themes and Context

(0 User reviews)   70
In Category - Birds
Saunders, Marshall, 1861-1947 Project Gutenberg 2024 Not confirmed
Birds; Pets Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 69,229
Reading time 301 min
Text sections 38

My pets — Themes and Context can be approached with a clearer sense of reading commitment from its source measurements: 69,229 words, 5 hr 1 min estimated reading time, and 38 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 20.9 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Birds,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

A factual account of the author's aviary, drawn from diaries, detailing the behaviors and personalities of birds including owls, pigeons, canaries, and a mockingbird, with observations on their interactions and habits.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.9/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

h larger than a New England robin’s, but their eyes seemed immense. They had a peculiar habit of staring at their food, then twisting their heads round and round before they pounced on it. It was very amusing to see the owls “focus,” and it became a way of entertaining our friends.

They often had a tug of war over their meat, when I gave it to them without cutting it up. Sollie would seize one end of a piece of beefsteak, and Betsy would grasp the other, and then they would brace their little claws and pull until the taste of the raw flesh being too tantalizing, one would let go to swallow a morsel, and at once lose the whole thing.

When the autumn had come we, with other summer residents, left Mill Valley where, I must not forget to say, numbers of beautiful birds abounded. Some of the public-spirited citizens had imported foreign birds in the hope of acclimating them. I was often awakened by a gay note and a flash of red at the window, as some foreigner wished me good-morning. The birds were protected, and the fine forests were also protected. When we went for picnics, mounted guards would warn us that we must light no fires under the magnificent old trees.

The owl’s next place of residence was Berkeley, where my younger sister went to take classes in the State University. We had rented a small cottage there, and to this day we laugh over our experiences in moving to our new home. We had the two owls, Hawkie, the dog Teddy, and a chipmunk that my married sister had brought me from Lake Tahoe, that most beautiful of Californian summer resorts. How were we to take charge of all these creatures? For we had to cross the bay of San Francisco, then recross it to Berkeley. We finally got a large cage for Hawkie and the owls, and put in a compartment, giving them the upper part, and the chipmunk the lower. The dog we put on a chain.

Taking the train from Mill Valley to Sausalito, we boarded the steamer for San Francisco, changed to another, and went across the bay to Oakland, thence by train to Berkeley. When we arrived there it was late in the afternoon, and my sister and I, the dog, the owls, Hawkie, and the chipmunk, were all tired out. Indeed, the dog, who was very petted and spoiled, and who did not enjoy traveling, had dark rings around his eyes, and was in a peevish, mischievous condition. To my sister’s disgust, for she being the younger was the victim, he started to run away. She had to run after him, and came back exhausted.

To add to our troubles, we could not get into our cottage that night. Fortunately, our landlady took boarders, and offered us a room in her house. We gladly accepted this offer, and putting the subdued Teddy in a tool-shed, took the birds in the house.

My sister says she never was more tired in her life than she was that night. We were sleeping blissfully, when we were awakened by a well-known sound. The naughty little owls, glad of the peace and quietness of the night after the turmoil of the day, were hooting persistently and melodiously.

“The landlady and the boarders,” gasped my sister; “they will hear and wake up. Can’t you stop the little wretches?”

I sprang out of bed, and addressed a solemn remonstrance to Solomon and Betsy. They were exceedingly glad to see me, and distending their little throats, continued to hoot, their clear, sweet young voices carrying only too well on the still Californian night air.

Then the chipmunk woke up and began to slide up and down an inclined piece of wood in his part of the cage. We were in despair. We could not sleep, until I had the happy thought of giving the owls a bath. I seized Betsy, held her in a basin of water, and wet her feathers considerably. Then I served Solomon in the same way, and for the rest of the night the tiny little things occupied themselves in smoothing their wet plumage. The chipmunk quieted down, and we had peace.

Marshall Saunders’ My Pets opens with a specific origin: two Californian screech owls acquired in 1899 while the author was studying boy life at Belmont School near San Francisco. The book is presented not as fiction but as a diary-based record of an aviary, with the author noting that many of the birds described were still living at the time of writing. The dedication addresses readers who demand entirely true stories, and the text repeatedly grounds its claims in personal observation rather than general natural history.

From Diaries to Aviary Chronicle

The book’s structure follows the author’s direct experience, beginning with the acquisition of the owls and moving through a series of chapters on different species. The table of contents lists chapters on robins, mockingbirds, sparrows, pigeons, canaries, cardinals, and others, each apparently drawn from diary entries. The author states explicitly that the story of the aviary is “taken from my diaries,” and the narrative voice is consistently first-person and present-tense in describing ongoing events. This method produces a record that is episodic rather than synthetic, with each chapter focusing on a particular bird or group. The text does not attempt to cover all bird species systematically but instead follows the author’s changing interests and the birds that came into her care.

Whistler the Pigeon: A Case Study in Behavior

One extended passage concerns a pigeon named Whistler, whose behavior is described in considerable detail. Whistler is portrayed as aggressive, engaging in mock fights with the author’s father, who wore gloves to spar with the bird. The pigeon’s interactions with other birds are also noted: he bullied a lame tumbler named Crippie and was avoided by another pigeon, Sukey. The author describes Whistler’s apparent delight at being brought indoors, where he treated a sandal as a companion and sat on a nest with an egg. These observations are presented as factual occurrences, with the author interpreting the bird’s actions in anthropomorphic terms—Whistler “talked” to the sandals and “bowed politely”—but the underlying behavior is documented with specificity.

Sukey’s Nest-Building and Object Collection

Another detailed account involves Sukey, a pigeon who developed unusual nest-building habits. The author describes dismantling a nest that contained “assorted sizes of hairpins, a black-headed pin, a half-burnt match, a withered mayflower, a feather from an indigo bunting’s wing, and some little sticks.” Sukey is also reported to have tossed the author’s mother’s spectacles in the air and stolen a garnet ring from a dressing-table. These incidents are presented as evidence of the bird’s individual personality and intelligence, not as generic pigeon behavior. The author’s method is to record specific, often quirky actions, and the text avoids generalizing about species-wide traits. The focus remains on the particular birds in the aviary and their unique habits.

Readers interested in the intersection of personal observation and natural history will find My Pets a document of one person’s sustained engagement with birds. The book does not offer scientific analysis or broad conclusions; instead, it presents a series of incidents that reveal the author’s close attention to individual animals. Those approaching it as a source for bird behavior should note that the accounts are filtered through the author’s interpretive lens and are not systematic. The value lies in the specificity of the anecdotes and the author’s evident familiarity with her subjects.

I keep thinking about how those birds in the diary felt like quiet presences, each with their own stubborn little personality. There’s something similar in Bob: The Story of Our Mocking-bird — Background and Themes, where a single bird’s habits start to feel like a familiar room you return to. It lingered, softly, like an old song.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

How did this book work for you?

Your answers remain private and are stored only in this browser.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Where are you in your reading?

2

How much did you enjoy the reading experience?

3

Is this a title you would suggest to others?

4

How demanding did the text feel?

Related eBooks