About 58 minutes
Birds of the National Parks in Hawaii — A Reader’s Guide
Birds
13,169 recorded words. 22 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #59398The source record for Bob: The Story of Our Mocking-bird — Background and Themes measures this digital text at 8,174 words, 36 min estimated reading time, and 1 detected text section.
The text analysis averages about 25.2 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Mockingbirds,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Explore this collection
These alternatives are selected using recorded categories and estimated reading time.
About 58 minutes
Birds
13,169 recorded words. 22 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #59398About 69 minutes
Birds
15,835 recorded words. 33 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #24378About 69 minutes
Birds
15,727 recorded words. 33 minutes difference from this book's estimate.
View Gutenberg source #62490Search stored excerpts and compare books → Choose by your preferences →
Choices use stored catalog measurements. Estimates vary with reading speed. A shared category is a catalog label, not a claim that two books have the same argument or literary quality.
Search reads excerpt text stored with this catalog and links to its associated Gutenberg record. The connection is stored in the site database; this tool does not recheck that every excerpt is word-for-word identical to that external record. Excerpt search does not cover every chapter and does not verify historical publication dates.
Catalog snapshot checked: 2026-09-26. Coverage: 99 public books, 99 available source excerpts.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Public-domain source text
The source text is kept in the dedicated reader, separate from this catalogue record and its commentary.
The prefatory note by Charles Day Lanier frames this work as a 'veracious picture of a bird-individual and a bird-species,' rooted in the poet Sidney Lanier's habit of 'practical, face-to-face conversation with nature.' The excerpts that follow bear this out: they are less a systematic natural history than a series of finely observed episodes, each revealing Bob's distinct personality through specific, often surprising behaviors.
Rather than cataloging mockingbird traits in the abstract, Lanier builds a portrait from incidents—Bob's delayed imitation of a whistled tune, his comic dejection during feather loss, his use of a scolding cry as a joke. The text's structure mirrors this anecdotal approach, moving from one telling moment to the next without a rigid scientific framework.
One of the most striking passages describes Bob's response to a whistled tune. At first, he showed 'no attempt at imitation,' merely an 'air of attention.' Only later, 'quite unexpectedly, in the hilarious flow of his birdsongs,' did a perfect reproduction emerge. Lanier interprets this as a mark of artistic temperament: 'Like a great artist he was rather above futile and amateurish efforts. He took things into his mind, turned them over, and, when he was perfectly sure of them, brought them forth with perfection and with unconcence.'
The phrasing is notable for its anthropomorphic confidence—Lanier does not hedge. He attributes to Bob a conscious process of reflection and mastery, a claim that goes beyond typical observations of mimicry. The episode also reveals Lanier's own method: he repeats the experiment on a different day, noting the same initial non-response, before the eventual performance. This suggests a patient, iterative observation, though the excerpts do not indicate how many repetitions occurred or whether other tunes were tested.
Lanier repeatedly links Bob's emotions to precise physical postures. When pleased, Bob 'extends his right wing and stretches his leg along the inner surface of it as far as he is able.' When curious or alarmed, he 'stretches his body until he seems incredibly tall and of the size of his neck all the way.' When cold, he 'makes himself into a round ball of feathers.'
The most extended description concerns molting. Lanier writes that during feather loss Bob is 'unspeakably dejected,' and that when his tail feathers dropped entirely, his 'dejection during this period was so extreme that we could not but believe he had some idea of his personal appearance.' The passage is careful to note that this is an inference—'we could not but believe'—but it is presented as the most plausible reading of Bob's behavior. The detail that Bob was 'cut to the soul' by smiles at his tailless state further emphasizes Lanier's tendency to read human-like self-consciousness into the bird's reactions.
The excerpts conclude with a discussion among the family about whether Bob's caged life is preferable to freedom in the wild. One unnamed disputant argues that 'the general end of a song is to be heard,' and that Bob's life in captivity has been 'one long blessing to several people who stood in need of him,' whereas in the woods he would likely have gained 'not one appreciative listener for a single half-hour out of each year.'
This passage is notable for its explicit weighing of utilitarian and aesthetic values. The argument does not deny the loss of freedom but reframes the bird's purpose in terms of audience and appreciation. The text does not resolve the debate—Lanier notes 'conflicting opinions' and then breaks off with a promise to 'mercifully release you from several morals.' The incompleteness of the excerpt leaves the ethical question open, though the framing clearly leans toward justifying the captivity as a net good for both bird and humans.
The excerpts offer a portrait built from specific, repeatable behaviors rather than general traits. Lanier's observations of delayed mimicry, molting dejection, and the cage debate each ground the narrative in concrete incidents, while his interpretive language—attributing artistic pride, self-consciousness, and humor to Bob—reveals the poet's own sensibility. Readers should note that the full text likely contains additional episodes and may develop the ethical questions further. The illustrations by A. Radclyffe Dugmore, mentioned in the prefatory note as color photographs from life, are not represented in these excerpts but form a significant part of the original edition.
There’s something about Bob’s silent, seasonal moods—how he’d sulk after molting, as if his own feathers betrayed him—that kept circling back to the quieter pages of that old hunting journal, Big Game Shooting, volume 2 (of 2) — Reading Companion, where patience feels less like a virtue and more like a waiting. Both books measure life in small, deliberate pauses, I suppose.
Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.