American Weasels — Background and Themes

(0 User reviews)   37
In Category - Insects
Hall, E. Raymond (Eugene Raymond), 1902-1986 Project Gutenberg 2013 Not confirmed
Weasels; Mammals -- America Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 189,817
Reading time 826 min
Text sections 37

This digital edition of American Weasels — Background and Themes is described by source-level measurements including 189,817 words, 13 hr 46 min estimated reading time, and 37 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 13.6 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Weasels,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

E. Raymond Hall's 1951 monograph on American weasels combines meticulous taxonomic descriptions with analysis of geographic variation in pelage color, cranial measurements, and distribution, supported by specimen records and field data.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.9/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

t show up again; even an hour later, the Mouse had not been disturbed."

There are two suggestions, but no proof that I know of, in the literature that the least weasel eats insects. Abbott (1884:27-32--1st ed., 1884) gives considerable information on the food (some insects included) of the "little weasel" which he describes (_op. cit._; 27) as having "a little pointed tail of a uniform brown color." Although this suggests _Mustela rixosa_, Abbott mentions on the next page (page 28) that a specimen of the smaller weasel measured six and a half inches from the tip of the snout to the base of the tail and that the tail itself measured two and a fourth inches to the tip of the last caudal vertebra. These measurements indicate that _Mustela erminea_ was involved. Because of the uncertainty as to the species of _Mustela_ involved, Abbott's interesting data on food, nest and behavior are not recorded in the present work. Seton (1929 (2):636) says that of several least weasels brought to D. Nicholson at Morden, Manitoba, most of them decayed so quickly that they could not be saved as specimens. To Seton this indicated that insects were an important part of the food of the weasels.

In summary: Least weasels are known to eat harvest mice, deer mice, meadow mice and red-backed mice; it is suspected that they eat also insects.

Polderboer (1948:296) has taken six specimens in "northeastern Iowa [in] . . . January and December--all males in winter pelage. None of these males showed signs of sexual activity; in all, the testes were retracted and diminutive in size. . . . A male least weasel in brown pelage was taken November 17, 1945, at Marion, Iowa. This specimen had large testes that had descended into the scrotum. The testes, when removed, were about the size of medium-sized garden peas. Microscopic examination of the testes and the vasa deferentia showed mature sperms to be present. . . ."

On July 1, 1917, in Clay County, Nebraska, a nest with four young was found (Swenk, 1926:321). On July 29, 1939, an adult and five young were plowed out of the ground in Allegan County, Michigan; one of the two young males weighed 40.5 grams two days after capture (Allen, 1940:459-460). On August 12, 1932, ten young with the mother, were found in Roseau County, Minnesota (Swanson and Fryklund, 1935:125). September appears to have been the month of birth of a specimen, no. 8472 in the Carnegie Museum, taken on November 24 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In October, a young least weasel is recorded from Pennsylvania (Winecoff, 1930:313). Early December was the time of birth of a specimen, approximately 10 weeks old, no. 88077, University of Michigan, taken on February 21 in Allegan County. On December 25, 1927, in Washington County, Pennsylvania, "five full-sized, though young . . . animals were caught under the same pile of corn fodder" (Sutton, 1929:253). The first week of January seems to have been the time of birth of a juvenile, no. 88080, University of Michigan, taken in Livingston County, Michigan, on March 27, 1943, since the specimen is approximately seven weeks old. On January 15, 1929, in Washington County, Pennsylvania, four young with the eyes yet unopened were obtained from a nest (Sutton, 1929:254). On January 25, 1928, young, the eyes of which may not yet have been open, were taken from a den in Washington County, Pennsylvania, by Winecoff (1930:313), who records other young having been taken in the same month as well as in February. On March 10, a female from North Portal, Saskatchewan, gave birth to four young (Dunk, 1946:392). On April 18, 1916, four young, half grown, were taken in Nebraska (Swenk, 1926:317). On April 2, 1929, three young were found in Roseau County, Minnesota, according to Swanson and Fryklund (1935:125) who remark that: "The Pennsylvania and Minnesota records show that least weasels may be born any time from July to early February in the northern states." Now, with all of the above records available, it turns out that November, May and June are the only months in which young least weasels have not been reported. Of course some of the young, for which the ages were not specified, were born in preceding months. Even so, the data now available suggests that, in the United States, young least weasels may be born in every month of the year. The number per litter is 3, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, and 10, yielding an average of 5.

The rate of growth of the young has not been studied enough to allow of judging if it differs significantly from that of other species of the genus. Allen (1940:459-460), however, tells us that of the three young females and two young males captured on July 29, 1939, in Allegan County, Michigan, one male that was killed on July 31, 1939, weighed 40.5 grams. The male remaining alive increased from 46 grams (August 5) to 62.5 grams on September 20, having eaten 63 mice while in captivity. The females in the period of August 5 to September 4 increased in weight as follows: 41 up to 49 grams; 44 to 50 grams; and 47 to 58 grams, having eaten, by September 26, 60, 64 and 65 mice.

E. Raymond Hall's American Weasels (1951) opens with a vivid observation: the weasel's actions are 'quick as a flash,' a phrase that captures both the animal's agility and the author's own precision. This monograph, published as part of the University of Kansas Museum of Natural History series, is a systematic treatment of the genus Mustela in the Americas. Hall's approach is grounded in specimen-based evidence, with detailed accounts of subspecies, cranial measurements, and geographic variation. The work reflects a mid-century naturalist's commitment to exhaustive documentation, from pelage color charts to locality records spanning decades.

Diction and Descriptive Precision

Hall's language is deliberately technical, yet it occasionally reveals a naturalist's eye for movement and form. He describes the weasel's body as 'round, slender,' and notes the tail's proportion—'a third' of total length—with mathematical exactness. In the systematic accounts, adjectives like 'coarser pelage' and 'larger tympanic bullae' serve as diagnostic tools, not literary flourishes. The author avoids anthropomorphism; even the phrase 'quick as a flash' is attributed to common description rather than personal observation. This restraint underscores the scientific rigor of the text, where every word is chosen for clarity and precision.

Voice in Systematic Description

The voice in the systematic sections is impersonal and authoritative, yet it carries the quiet authority of firsthand examination. Hall writes of a type specimen: 'The skull has been cut vertically in two at the plane of the glenoid fossae. These fossae and all the cranium posterior to them are missing.' The passive construction and clinical detail convey a methodical, almost forensic approach. When describing pelage color, he references Oberthür and Dauthenay's color plates—'near tone 3 of Burnt Umber'—anchoring subjective observation to a standardized scale. This voice prioritizes replicability over narrative, reflecting the monograph's role as a reference work.

Structure and the Role of Locality Data

Hall's structure is hierarchical: after introductory chapters on paleontology, dentition, and variation, the bulk of the work consists of species accounts. Each account includes a synonymy, type description, range, and list of specimens examined. The locality lists are exhaustive, often reading as strings of place names: 'Gainesville, 4; Marion County: "Silver Springs," 1.' These lists serve as a cumulative record of field collection, mapping the weasel's distribution through accumulated data points. The inclusion of coordinates and collector numbers transforms the text into a database, anticipating later digital approaches to biodiversity informatics.

Recurring Details in Coloration and Geography

A recurring theme is the correlation between pelage color and environmental factors. Hall notes that in regions of heavy rainfall, pigmentation increases and white facial markings decrease; in arid regions, the opposite occurs. He explicitly states that color is 'an hereditary character,' not visibly altered in a few generations, based on rearing experiments. This observation recurs across subspecies accounts, linking phenotype to geography. The plates—such as Plate 1, showing ten subspecies of Mustela frenata—visually reinforce this pattern. Hall's attention to such details reveals a deeper interest in evolutionary mechanisms, even within a primarily taxonomic framework.

Readers approaching American Weasels should treat it as a primary source for mid-20th-century mammalogy. The text rewards those who read systematically: the introductory chapters provide context for the species accounts, while the locality data and measurements offer raw material for historical biogeography. Hall's work stands as a document of its time, reflecting both the strengths and limitations of pre-molecular taxonomy. For modern researchers, it offers a baseline for studying changes in weasel distribution and morphology over the past seventy years.

In Hall's careful pages, the weasel's changing coat across seasons felt like a quiet argument about place and time. That same patient wonder surfaces in Illustrations of Exotic Entomology, Volume 2 — Key Ideas to Explore, where each engraved beetle holds its own geography. Both volumes whisper of how small lives record vast landscapes, waiting for a still reader to notice.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Before you leave, reflect on the book

Use these questions to collect your thoughts before moving on.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Have you finished this book?

2

How much did you enjoy the reading experience?

3

Would you recommend this book to another reader?

4

What was the reading difficulty like?

Related eBooks